<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>Patient Safety in Surgery - Most viewed articles</title>
		<link>http://www.pssjournal.commostviewed/</link>
		<description>Most viewed articles in last 30 days from Patient Safety in Surgery (ISSN 1754-9493) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
         <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/17"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/13"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/1/1/3"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/2"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/1/1/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/10"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/12"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/16"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/1/1/7"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/1/1/8"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/15"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/17">
            
            <title>Surgical options in the management of cystic duct avulsion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy</title>
			<description>Background:
Avulsion of cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is not a common intraoperative complication, but may be encountered by any laparoscopic surgeon. Surgeons are rarely familiar with management of this condition.
Methods:
Patients with gall stone related problems who were scheduled for LC at the minimal invasive surgery unit of a tertiary referral hospital during a 5 years period (April 2002&#8211;April 2007) were prospectively enrolled.
Results:
12 cases were identified (incidence: 1.15%). All 12 patients had gallbladder inflammation. Five patients had acute and seven patients had chronic cholecystitis. The avulsed cystic duct (ACD) was managed by clipping in 4, intracorporeal suturing in 3, converting to open surgery with suture ligation in 2, and lonely external drainage in 3 patients. Bile leakage had ceased within 3 days in 2, 14 days in one, and 20 days in the other patient. Bile volume increased gradually in one of the patients, which stopped only after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) at 25th postoperative day. No major late complication or mortality occurred.
Conclusion:
ACD during LC is a rare complication. Almost all standard methods of treatment yield to successful outcomes with low morbidity. According to the situation, ACD may be successfully managed laparoscopically. Available cystic stump remnant was clipped. Intracorporeal suture ligation was performed when short length of stump precluded clipping. Deeply retracted cystic duct with active bile leak led to conversion to open surgery. With minimal or no bile leak at ACD stump, closed tube drainage of sub-hepatic area was attempted. Persistent bile leak was assumed to be controlled by ES, successfully accomplished in one patient.</description>
			<link>http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/17</link>		
			<dc:creator>Faramarz Karimian, Ali Aminian, Rasoul Mirsharifi and Farhad Mehrkhani</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Patient Safety in Surgery 2008, 2:17</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 378</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-20</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1754-9493-2-17</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Patient Safety in Surgery</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1754-9493</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-20</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/13">
            
            <title>Labetalol infusion for refractory hypertension causing severe hypotension and bradycardia: an issue of patient safety</title>
			<description>Incremental doses of intravenous labetalol are safe and effective and, at times, such therapy may need to be augmented by a continuous infusion of labetalol to control severe hypertension. Continuous infusions of labetalol may exceed the recommended maximum daily dose of 300 mg on occasion. We report a case in which hypertension occurring after an abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, initially responsive to intermittent intravenous beta-blockade, became resistant to this therapy leading to the choice of an intravenous labetalol infusion as the therapeutic option. The labetalol infusion resulted in a profound cardiovascular compromise in this postoperative critically ill patient. While infusions of labetalol have successfully been used, prolonged administration in the intensive care unit requires vigilance and the establishment of a therapeutic rationale/policy for interventions, such as the ready availability of glucagon, &#946;-agonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, insulin, and vasopressin when severe cardiovascular depression occurs.</description>
			<link>http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/13</link>		
			<dc:creator>Samir Fahed, Daniel F Grum and Thomas J Papadimos</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Patient Safety in Surgery 2008, 2:13</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 309</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-27</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1754-9493-2-13</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Patient Safety in Surgery</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1754-9493</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/1/1/3">
            
            <title>Orchiectomy as a result of ischemic orchitis after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: case report of a rare complication</title>
			<description>Background:
Ischemic orchitis is an established complication after open inguinal hernia repair, but ischemic orchitis resulting in orchiectomy after the laparoscopic approach has not been reported.Case presentationThe patient was a thirty-three year-old man who presented with bilateral direct inguinal hernias, right larger than left. He was a thin, muscular male with a narrow pelvis who underwent bilateral extraperitoneal mesh laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The case was complicated by pneumoperitoneum which limited the visibility of the pelvic anatomy; however, the mesh was successfully deployed bilaterally. Cautery was used to resect the direct sac on the right. The patient was discharged the same day and doing well with minimal pain and swelling until the fourth day after surgery. That night he presented with sudden-onset pain and swelling of his right testicle and denied both trauma to the area and any sexual activity. Ultrasound of the testicle revealed no blood flow to the testicle which required exploration and subsequent orchiectomy.
Conclusion:
Ischemic orchitis typically presents 2&#8211;3 days after inguinal hernia surgery and can progress to infarction. This ischemic injury is likely due to thrombosis of the venous plexus, rather than iatrogenic arterial injury or inappropriate closure of the inguinal canal. Ultrasound/duplex scanning of the postoperative acute scrotum can help differentiate ischemic orchitis from infarction. Unfortunately, testicular torsion cannot be ruled out and scrotal exploration may be necessary. Although ischemic orchitis, atrophy, and orhiectomy are uncommon complications, all patients should be warned of these potential complications and operative consent should include these risks irrespective of the type of hernia or the surgical approach.</description>
			<link>http://www.pssjournal.com/content/1/1/3</link>		
			<dc:creator>John B Moore and Erik A Hasenboehler</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Patient Safety in Surgery 2007, 1:3</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 304</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-11-07</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1754-9493-1-3</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Patient Safety in Surgery</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1754-9493</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-07</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/2">
            
            <title>Complications and safety aspects of kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective follow-up study in 102 consecutive patients</title>
			<description>Background:
Kyphoplasty represents an established minimal-invasive method for correction and augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Reliable data on perioperative and postoperative complications are lacking in the literature. The present study was designed to evaluate the incidence and patterns of perioperative complications in order to determine the safety of this procedure for patients undergoing kyphoplasty.Patients and MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 102 consecutive patients (82 women and 20 men; mean age 69) with 135 operatively treated fractured vertebrae who underwent a kyphoplasty between January 2004 to June 2006. Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed for up 6 months after surgery.
Results:
Preoperative pain levels, as determined by the visual analogous scale (VAS) were 7.5 +/- 1.3. Postoperative pain levels were significantly reduced at day 1 after surgery (VAS 2.3 +/- 2.2) and at 6-month follow-up (VAS 1.4 +/- 0.9). Fresh vertebral fractures at adjacent levels were detected radiographically in 8 patients within 6 months. Two patients had a loss of reduction with subsequent sintering of the operated vertebrae and secondary spinal stenosis. Accidental cement extravasation was detected in 7 patients in the intraoperative radiographs. One patient developed a postoperative infected spondylitis at the operated level, which was treated by anterior corporectomy and 360 degrees fusion. Another patient developed a superficial wound infection which required surgical revision. Postoperative bleeding resulting in a subcutaneous haematoma evacuation was seen in one patient.
Conclusion:
The data from the present study imply that percutaneous kyphoplasty can be associated with severe intra- and postoperative complications. This minimal-invasive surgical procedure should therefore be performed exclusively by spine surgeons who have the capability of managing perioperative complications.</description>
			<link>http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/2</link>		
			<dc:creator>Yohan Robinson, Sven Kevin Tsch&#246;ke, Philip F Stahel, Ralph Kayser and Christoph E Heyde</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Patient Safety in Surgery 2008, 2:2</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 299</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-01-15</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1754-9493-2-2</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Patient Safety in Surgery</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1754-9493</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-15</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/1/1/6">
            
            <title>Repetitive posterior iliac crest autograft harvest resulting in an unstable pelvic fracture and infected non-union: case report and review of the literature</title>
			<description>Fractures of the pelvic ring have been well studied, and the biomechanical relationship between the anterior and posterior elements is an important concept to understand these complex injuries. The vast majority of these injuries are due to trauma. However, in rare circumstances, autogenous bone graft harvesting may lead to an unstable pelvic ring. In this case report, we describe a rare complication in a 70-year old female patient who developed an unstable pelvis and an infected non-union secondary to repeated posterior iliac graft harvest. The orthopaedic surgeon should be aware of this detrimental complication associated with extensive or repeated posterior iliac crest graft harvest.</description>
			<link>http://www.pssjournal.com/content/1/1/6</link>		
			<dc:creator>Matthew J Oakley, Wade R Smith, Steven J Morgan, Navid M Ziran and Bruce H Ziran</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Patient Safety in Surgery 2007, 1:6</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 289</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-12-17</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1754-9493-1-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Patient Safety in Surgery</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1754-9493</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-17</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/10">
            
            <title>Alcohol based surgical prep solution and the risk of fire in the operating room: a case report</title>
			<description>A few cases of fire in the operating room are reported in the literature. The factors that may initiate these fires are many and include alcohol based surgical prep solutions, electrosurgical equipment, flammable drapes etc. We are reporting a case of fire in the operating room while operating on a patient with burst fracture C6 vertebra with quadriplegia. The cause of the fire was due to incomplete drying of the covering drapes with an alcohol based surgical prep solution. This paper discusses potential preventive measures to minimize the incidence of fire in the operating room.</description>
			<link>http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/10</link>		
			<dc:creator>Sumit Batra and Rajiv Gupta</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Patient Safety in Surgery 2008, 2:10</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 286</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-04-26</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1754-9493-2-10</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Patient Safety in Surgery</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1754-9493</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-26</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/12">
            
            <title>Skin avulsion injury during endotracheal tube extubation &#8211; case report of an unusual complication</title>
			<description>We report a geriatric case with a full-thickness skin avulsion injury during extubation due to a tube securing tape used to fixate the endotracheal tube. The avulsed skin was sutured back to its original place. Based on this single geriatric patient, we recommend anesthesiologists/anesthetists and surgeons be aware of the potential risk of avulsing the skin with tape during a standard extubation procedure. This may especially occur in geriatric patients who have age related changes as decreased elasticity and resistance to shearing forces that predispose the skin to get traumatized easily.</description>
			<link>http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/12</link>		
			<dc:creator>Berkhan Yilmaz, Kutay Colakoglu and Raffi Gurunluoglu</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Patient Safety in Surgery 2008, 2:12</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 270</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-21</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1754-9493-2-12</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Patient Safety in Surgery</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1754-9493</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/16">
            
            <title>The future of patient safety: surgical trainees accept virtual reality as a new training tool.</title>
			<description>Background:
The use of virtual reality (VR) has gained increasing interest to acquire laparoscopic skills outside the operating theatre and thus increasing patients' safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate trainees' acceptance of VR for assessment and training during a skills course and at their institution.
Methods:
All 735 surgical trainees of the International Gastrointestinal Surgery Workshop 2006-2008, held in Davos, Switzerland, were given a minimum of 45 minutes for VR training during the course. Participants' opinion on VR was analyzed with a standardized questionnaire. 
Results:
Fivehundred-twenty-seven participants (72%) from 28 countries attended the VR sessions and answered the questionnaires. The possibility of using VR at the course was estimated as excellent or good in 68%, useful in 21%, reasonable in 9% and unsuitable or useless in 2%. If such VR simulators were available at their institution, most course participants would train at least one hour per week (46%), two or more hours (42%) and only 12% wouldn't use VR. Similarly, 63% participants would accept to operate on patients only after VR training and 55% to have VR as part of their assessment. 
Conclusions:
Residents accept and appreciate VR simulation for surgical assessment and training. The majority of the trainees are motivated to regularly spend time for VR training if accessible. </description>
			<link>http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/16</link>		
			<dc:creator>Rachel Rosenthal, Walter A Gantert, Christian Hamel, Jurg Metzger, Thomas Kocher, Peter Vogelbach, Nicolas Demartines and Dieter Hahnloser</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Patient Safety in Surgery 2008, 2:16</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 263</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-11</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1754-9493-2-16</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Patient Safety in Surgery</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1754-9493</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/1/1/7">
            
            <title>Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis &#8211; case report of a patient with clinical deterioration after surgery</title>
			<description>Background:
Although there is no evidence that the long-term effects of scoliosis surgery are superior to the long-term effects of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) itself, patients can fear the consequences of not under going this surgery due to incorrect or insufficient information. The main indication for surgical treatment in patients with AIS, is cosmetic. However spinal surgery may, along with other negative side effects, actually cause postoperative clinical deterioration. This complication of surgery has not yet been described in international literature.Case presentationA 15-year old female patient originally presenting with a well-compensated double curve pattern scoliosis. The patient was advised to undergo surgery due to the long-term negative impact of signs and symptoms of scoliosis upon her health. The patient agreed to surgery, which was performed in one of Germanys leading centres for spinal surgery. The thoracolumbar curve was corrected and fused, while the thoracic curve, clearly showing wedged vertebrae, defined as structural scoliosis, remained untreated.This operation left the patient with an unbalanced appearance, with radiological and clinical imbalance to the right. The clinical appearance of the patient though clearly deteriorated post-surgery. Furthermore, the wedged disc space below the fusion area indicates future problems with possible destabilisation accompanied probably by low back pain.
Conclusion:
Scoliosis surgery for patients with AIS is mainly indicated for cosmetic or psychological reasons. Therefore the treatment leading to the best possible clinical appearance and balance has to be chosen. Patients should be informed that surgery will not necessarily improve their health status. Clinical deterioration after surgery may occur, and such information is crucial for an adequate informed consent.</description>
			<link>http://www.pssjournal.com/content/1/1/7</link>		
			<dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Patient Safety in Surgery 2007, 1:7</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 211</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-12-19</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1754-9493-1-7</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Patient Safety in Surgery</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1754-9493</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-19</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/1/1/8">
            
            <title>Intraoperative brachial plexus injury during emergence following movement with arms restrained: a preventable complication?</title>
			<description>Background:
Despite considerable analysis and preventive strategies, brachial plexus injuries remain fairly common in the perioperative setting. These injuries range from brief periods of numbness or discomfort in the immediate postoperative period to, in rare cases, profound, prolonged losses of sensation and function. We present a case of an orthopedic surgery patient who suffered a brachial plexus injury while under anesthesia after trying to sit upright with his arms restrained.Case presentationAfter the uneventful placement of an intramedullary tibial nail, an 18 year old patient tried to sit upright with his arms restrained while still under the influence of anesthesia. In the immediate postoperative period, the patient complained of a profound loss of sensation in his left arm and an inability to flex his left elbow, suppinate his arm, or abduct and rotate his shoulder. Neurological examination and subsequent studies revealed a C5-6 brachial plexus injury. The patient underwent range of motion physical therapy and, over the next three months, regained the full function and sensation of his left arm.
Conclusion:
Restraining arms during general anesthesia to prevent injury remains a wise practice. However, to avoid injuring the brachial plexus while the arms are restrained, extra caution must be used to prevent unexpected patient movement and to ensure gentle emergence.</description>
			<link>http://www.pssjournal.com/content/1/1/8</link>		
			<dc:creator>Mark H Chandler, Laura DiMatteo, Erik A Hasenboehler and Michael Temple</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Patient Safety in Surgery 2007, 1:8</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 205</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-12-19</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1754-9493-1-8</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Patient Safety in Surgery</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1754-9493</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-19</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/15">
            
            <title>Pitfalls and complications in the treatment of cervical spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis</title>
			<description>Patients with ankylosing spondylitis are at significant risk for sustaining cervical spine injuries following trauma predisposed by kyphosis, stiffness and osteoporotic bone quality of the spine. The risk of sustaining neurological deficits in this patient population is higher than average. The present review article provides an outline on the specific injury patterns in the cervical spine, diagnostic algorithms and specific treatment modalities dictated by the underlying disease in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. An emphasis is placed on the risks and complication patterns in the treatment of these rare, but challenging injuries.</description>
			<link>http://www.pssjournal.com/content/2/1/15</link>		
			<dc:creator>Christoph-E Heyde, Johannes K Fakler, Erik Hasenboehler, Philip F Stahel, Thilo John, Yohan Robinson, Sven K Tschoeke and Ralph Kayser</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>Patient Safety in Surgery 2008, 2:15</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 185</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-06</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1754-9493-2-15</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Patient Safety in Surgery</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1754-9493</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-06</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
	<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
